Deal Lawyers Discusses Fairness Opinions with Chad Rucker

How to Avoid Provider Conflicts

By: Chad Rucker

The January-February Issue of the Deal Lawyers newsletter includes an article written by Chad Rucker, managing director of VRC’s New York office. In the article, Rucker examines the conflicts that exist in typical M&A assignments where a board of directors may hire an investment bank to provide advisory services.

“Often, that investment bank will also provide the board with a fairness opinion for a fixed fee,” says Rucker, “Many potential conflicts exist in such an arrangement.”

Enjoy your complimentary copy of this subscriber-only publication: Fairness Opinions: How to Avoid Conflicts of Interest

More Perspectives: Fairness Opinions

Receiving Dependable Fairness Opinions

Boards of directors can improve the likelihood of receiving a more defendable fairness opinion by making specific inquiries of their opinion provider.

+ Read More

The Only Legal Requirement for Fairness Opinions

California Corporations Code Section 1203 requires an affirmative fairness opinion to provide target shareholders with greater protection in takeover transactions.

+ Read More

Keys to Avoiding Failed M&A Deals

50 percent of M&A deals fail. How can a board avoid deal failure before an acquisition?

+ Read More