Deal Lawyers Discusses Fairness Opinions with Chad Rucker

How to Avoid Provider Conflicts

By: Chad Rucker

The January-February Issue of the Deal Lawyers┬ánewsletter includes an article written by Chad Rucker, managing director of VRC’s New York office. In the article, Rucker examines the conflicts that exist in typical M&A assignments where a board of directors may hire an investment bank to provide advisory services.

“Often, that investment bank will also provide the board with a fairness opinion for a fixed fee,” says Rucker, “Many potential conflicts exist in such an arrangement.”

Enjoy your complimentary copy of this subscriber-only publication: Fairness Opinions: How to Avoid Conflicts of Interest

More Perspectives: Fairness Opinions

Receiving Dependable Fairness Opinions

Boards of directors can improve the likelihood of receiving a more defendable fairness opinion by making specific inquiries of their opinion provider.

+ Read More

The Only Legal Requirement for Fairness Opinions

California Corporations Code Section 1203 requires an affirmative fairness opinion to provide target shareholders with greater protection in takeover transactions.

+ Read More

Keys to Avoiding Failed M&A Deals

50 percent of M&A deals fail. How can a board avoid deal failure before an acquisition?

+ Read More